Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Camilla Gennaro vs Mariya Poduraeva Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Gennaro vs Poduraeva analysis and find out who is favored!
Camilla Gennaro vs Mariya Poduraeva Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Gennaro 1 - 0 Poduraeva
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Gennaro has won 49.39% of points on their second serve, while Poduraeva has won 41.96%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Gennaro, in recent form, has won 55.13% of their opponent's second serve points, while Poduraeva has won 56.92%. The same stats for first serve returns are 42.42% and 41.03% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Gennaro has saved 53.91% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Poduraeva has saved 47.17% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Gennaro has won 41.67% of matches played (W/L 15/ 21), with Poduraeva winning 46.15% (W/L 18/ 21) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Gennaro has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 54% (W/L 39/ 33), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 43% (W/L 3/ 4). Poduraeva has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 41% (W/L 13/ 19), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 29% (W/L 2/ 5).
- Player level: In the last year, Gennaro has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 40% of matches (W/L 8/ 12), where as Poduraeva has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 45% of matches (W/L 9/ 11). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Gennaro winning 1 times and Poduraeva being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Gennaro winning 2 and Poduraeva winning 0. The last match between Gennaro and Poduraeva was at the W35 Santa Margherita di Pula, 16-04-2024, Q3, Clay with Camilla Gennaro getting the victory 6-2 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:31:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Gennaro and Poduraeva have played a deciding set 0 times, with Gennaro winning 0 times and Poduraeva 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Gennaro winning 0, and Poduraeva 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Gennaro has played against opponents with an average rank of 233.17 while Poduraeva has played against players with an average rank of 45.15.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Gennaro has won 44% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Poduraeva has won 50% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Gennaro has converted 51.16% of breakpoint opportunities, and Poduraeva has converted 48.41% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
897
Rank
893
High
20
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
23
Age
Plays
W
W
L
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
Form
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
51% (53-50)
Career Total W/L
39% (38-60)
53% (10-9)
YTD W/L
53% (9-8)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Camilla Gennaro | Mariya Poduraeva |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 6 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 2 | 4 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:31:0 | 1:31:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 51% (24/47) | 67% (42/63) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 67% (16/24) | 45% (19/42) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 57% (13/23) | 38% (8/21) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 60% (6/10) | 60% (3/5) |
| Return Points W% | 57% (36/63) | 38% (18/47) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-4 |
Stats 
Camilla Gennaro
Player
Mariya Poduraeva
51%
(
24 of
47)
1st Serve %
67%
(
42 of
63)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
4
67%
(
16 of
24)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
19 of
42)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
38%
(
18 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
36 of
63)
65
Total Points Won
45
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Camilla Gennaro | Mariya Poduraeva |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 53% (10/9) | 53% (9/8) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 50% (21/21) | 53% (19/17) |
| Games Win/Loss | 54% (191/166) | 51% (153/146) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 60% (3/2) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 56% (10/8) | 50% (4/4) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/1) | 50% (2/2) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.07 | 0.09 |
| Aces Total | 12 | 13 |
| DFs per game | 0.18 | 0.36 |
| DFs Total | 32 | 53 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:23:50 | 1:17:38 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 233.58 | 40.41 |
| 1st Serve % | 58% (566/979) | 72% (647/901) |
| 1st Serve W% | 58% (328/566) | 59% (383/647) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 49% (204/413) | 42% (107/255) |
| BPs Won% Total | 51% (66/129) | 48% (61/126) |
| Return Pts W% | 47% (482/1034) | 47% (400/849) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 45% (5/6) | 56% (5/4) |
| Futures W/L | 63% (5/3) | 50% (4/4) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (9/18) | 53% (9/17) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 25% (1/4) | 100% (1/1) |
| Deciding Set W% | 67% (2/3) | 50% (1/2) |
| 1st set W, W | 89% (9/8) | 100% (9/9) |
| 1st set W, L | 11% (9/1) | 0% (9/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 20% (10/2) | 0% (8/0) |
Camilla Gennaro Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Diletta Cherubini
Player
Camilla Gennaro
66%
(
46 of
70)
1st Serve %
58%
(
31 of
53)
-
Aces
-
5
Double Faults
3
70%
(
32 of
46)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
40%
(
28 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
29 of
53)
71
Total Points Won
52
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Camilla Gennaro
Player
Benedetta Ortenzi
60%
(
49 of
81)
1st Serve %
76%
(
68 of
90)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
59%
(
29 of
49)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
33 of
68)
63%
(
20 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
64%
(
9 of
14)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
40%
(
32 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
50 of
90)
99
Total Points Won
72
|
6-7(4) 6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Patricia Maria Tig
Player
Camilla Gennaro
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve %
48%
(
23 of
48)
5
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
34%
(
18 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
62
Total Points Won
39
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 6-4 7-5 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Stephanie Wagner
Player
Camilla Gennaro
64%
(
54 of
85)
1st Serve %
50%
(
38 of
76)
1
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
6
57%
(
31 of
54)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
14 of
38)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
45%
(
38 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
42 of
76)
89
Total Points Won
72
|
4-6 6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Camilla Gennaro
Player
Mariya Poduraeva
51%
(
24 of
47)
1st Serve %
67%
(
42 of
63)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
4
67%
(
16 of
24)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
19 of
42)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
38%
(
18 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
36 of
63)
65
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sapfo Sakellaridi
Player
Camilla Gennaro
50%
(
24 of
48)
1st Serve %
50%
(
26 of
52)
6
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
75%
(
18 of
24)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
31%
(
15 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
27 of
52)
60
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Tiantsoa Rakotomanga Rajaonah
Player
Camilla Gennaro
74%
(
48 of
65)
1st Serve %
62%
(
53 of
86)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
73%
(
35 of
48)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
34 of
53)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
19 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
35 of
86)
81
Total Points Won
70
|
6-4 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Camilla Gennaro
Player
Fiona Ganz
56%
(
32 of
57)
1st Serve %
76%
(
61 of
80)
0
Aces
2
-
Double Faults
-
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
32 of
61)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
35%
(
20 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
39 of
80)
76
Total Points Won
61
|
6-2 2-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Camilla Gennaro
Player
Delia Gaillard
59%
(
29 of
49)
1st Serve %
72%
(
38 of
53)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
2
59%
(
17 of
29)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
14 of
38)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
100%
(
7 of
7)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
43%
(
21 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
34 of
53)
62
Total Points Won
40
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Mariya Poduraeva Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Briana Szabo
Player
Mariya Poduraeva
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve %
61%
(
27 of
44)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
3
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
19 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
59
Total Points Won
35
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mariya Poduraeva
Player
Bianca Bulat
70%
(
32 of
46)
1st Serve %
86%
(
32 of
37)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
1
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
30%
(
14 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
54
Total Points Won
29
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Georgia Andreea Craciun
Player
Mariya Poduraeva
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve %
68%
(
36 of
53)
-
Aces
-
5
Double Faults
2
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
13 of
36)
33%
(
4 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
35%
(
16 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
33 of
53)
63
Total Points Won
36
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mariya Poduraeva
Player
Daria-Maria Anghel
76%
(
44 of
58)
1st Serve %
68%
(
30 of
44)
-
Aces
-
5
Double Faults
2
68%
(
30 of
44)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
29%
(
4 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
41%
(
24 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
63
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daria Zelinskaya
Player
Mariya Poduraeva
57%
(
27 of
47)
1st Serve %
63%
(
32 of
51)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
4
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
26%
(
12 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
24 of
51)
59
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mariya Poduraeva
Player
Mile Cibulskyte
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve %
47%
(
18 of
38)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
6
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
22%
(
4 of
18)
25%
(
3 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
4 of
20)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
39%
(
18 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
79%
(
30 of
38)
58
Total Points Won
26
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Viktoria Hruncakova
Player
Mariya Poduraeva
57%
(
32 of
56)
1st Serve %
83%
(
48 of
58)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
22 of
48)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
21 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
31 of
58)
66
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mariya Poduraeva
Player
Aglaya Fedorova
81%
(
72 of
89)
1st Serve %
53%
(
41 of
77)
0
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
16
58%
(
42 of
72)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
28 of
41)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
42%
(
37 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
34 of
77)
86
Total Points Won
80
|
6-3 1-6 10-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mariya Poduraeva
Player
Anastasiya Poplavska
77%
(
36 of
47)
1st Serve %
63%
(
34 of
54)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
33%
(
4 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
33%
(
6 of
18)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
40%
(
19 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
32 of
58)
61
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Camilla Gennaro
Player
Mariya Poduraeva
51%
(
24 of
47)
1st Serve %
67%
(
42 of
63)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
4
67%
(
16 of
24)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
19 of
42)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
38%
(
18 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
36 of
63)
65
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Gennaro Vs Poduraeva Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Gennaro are available here and Poduraeva photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
